Blog

Does Money Undercut Creativity in Product Development?

Posted on:June 30, 2011

Creativity is often a crucial element in successful new product developments. A study published in the July 2011 issue of the Journal of Marketing found that of 20 firms investigated, 15 offered some type of incentive program for creativity. Seven firms provided creativity training with several of those also offering incentives. The authors noted that other studies have consistently found that extrinsic rewards (external to a person) offered alone actually undermine the creative process (by reducing internal motivation). However, two experiments found that product creativity was greatest when monetary rewards and creativity training were offered together.  The training reinforces, rather than undermines, intrinsic motivation.
Burroughs, JE, et al. 2011. Facilitating and Rewarding Creativity During New Product Development. J Marketing.75:53-67.

— Claudia O’Donnell, Global Food Forums, Inc., a conference and seminar organizer

12 Steps to Improve New Product Success

Posted on:June 29, 2011
new products on grocery shelves

A Nielsen press release says companies spend $15 million on average to market a new product with some companies spending over $60 million.

A  June  22, 2011 press release from Nielsen, a global information company,  notes that a new approach developed by the company  can improve the likelihood of new product success from some 10% to 75%. Nielsen offered these twelve criteria that every new product must meet in order to succeed.
1. Distinct Proposition – Does the product offer a true innovation?
2. Attention-catching – Will the product be noticed?
3. Message Connection – Is your message conveyed in a simple, persuasive way?
4. Do you have a Clear and Concise Message? Is it conveyed without clutter?
5. Does your product have a substantial Need/Desire? Is it solving a problem or meeting consumers’ needs?
6. What is your product’s advantage? Is it better than others currently in the marketplace?
7. Credibility – Are your product claims believable?
8. Acceptable Downsides – (Typically related to side effects for over-the-counter (OTC) products)
9. Findability – Is the product where consumers expect it to be? Can shoppers find it easily among the competition?
10. Acceptable Costs – What are the cost/benefit trade-offs at the shelf? This could be price, calorie content, usage instructions, among other factors.
11. Product Delivery – Did you meet or exceed consumers’ expectations? Are you delivering on your product’s promise?
12. Product Loyalty – Will consumers continue to purchase your product in the future?
Source: Nielsen

— Claudia O’Donnell, Global Food Forums, a conference and seminar organizer


Are You Working for a Sustainable World?

Posted on:June 28, 2011
Large farm

Sustainability will be crucial to providing food for the world while minimizing harm to the planet.

I just put in a fence around one section of my garden to keep out turtles; the rest of the garden is protected by a high fence to keep out deer. Those are the primary pests I have to deal with and I simply don’t grow crops that would need pesticides. I live in an area with good rainfall and excellent soil. I view my garden as one small step for locally grown, low carbon footprint agriculture. But, it’s a good thing I don’t have to live solely from it; I and my family would have starved months ago. We, like much of humanity, rely on large efficient farms and processed foods that feed us over long winter months and, well, most of the rest of the year as well.

Professor Steve Jones, Head of the Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment at University College London in 2010 said, “Humans are 10,000 times more common than we should be, according to the rules of the animal kingdom, and we have agriculture to thank for that. Without farming, the world population would probably have reached half a million by now – about the size of the population of Glasgow.” (See http://tinyurl.com/3j7hd42.)

We are now seven billion on earth and the U.S. Census Bureau’s International Data Base predicts nine billion people by 2050.

I believe the planet can successfully support that many humans. Efforts include boosting crop yields, including through judicious use of genetically modified crops, more efficient food processing with less waste and maximized resources to individual efforts such as reduced food consumption (we do eat more than we need, or that is even good for us) to, well, little garden plots with turtle fences.

It must be “all hands on deck” if everyone is to be fed and damage to the global environment is to be kept to a minimum. What are you doing…what is your company doing to provide for a sustainable future?

— Claudia O’Donnell, Global Food Forums, a conference and seminar organizer


Emerging Food Technologies

Posted on:June 18, 2011
Canning was an important advance in food preservation.

Canning was first developed by Nicolas Appert in 1810 who won an award from the French government for devising an inexpensive and effective method to preserve large amounts of food. Illustration: 1943 Poster. Artist: Parker, Alfred, 1906-1985. United States. Office of War Information.

It is currently popular for consumer pressure groups to condemn modern agricultural, food production and food processing methods (and admittedly the food industry has brought some of this on itself). How easily it has been forgotten that food technology advances, from canning that allows for economical distribution and storage of foods, to vitamin and mineral fortification that has virtually eliminated common health conditions like rickets in developed countries, are food technologies that have made the world a better place for humans.

This post will look at emerging, mostly applied food science. Some may feel they are crucial, some may feel they are frivolous.

For one example, read the comment on natural preservatives and natural and artificial flavorings under the post ” Giving Consumers what they want: Natural and Organic.” http://tiny.cc/8svyg

— Claudia O’Donnell, Global Food Forums, a conference and seminar organizer


Global Health Statistics-Diabetes

Posted on:June 15, 2011

 

Except for Thailand, diabetes management rates were not related to income and education.

The importance of health insurance was recently pointed out in a recent World Health Organization paper entitled “Management of diabetes and associated cardiovascular risk factors in seven countries: a comparison of data from national health examination surveys[1]
It found that a range of people, from 24% of the women in Scotland and the USA to 62% of the men in Thailand, have undiagnosed and untreated diabetes. Although income and education were not found to be significantly related to the rates of diagnosis and treatment (except for Thailand), in three countries with good data on health insurance, it was found that people with insurance were more likely to have their diabetes diagnosed and effectively managed.

One could argue that the availability of health insurance in this case would keep down longer term significant health costs.

The seven countries studied were Colombia, England, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mexico, Scotland, Thailand and the USA.

Un resumen de español para “Tratamiento de la diabetes y factores de riesgo cardiovascular asociados en siete países: comparación de datos de las encuestas nacionales de exámenes medicos” está disponible al final del documento.

[1] Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Mar 1;89(3):172-83. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

— Claudia O’Donnell, Global Food Forums, a conference and seminar organizer


Page 42 of 43« First...102030...3940414243
gff_ads_pos1 gff_ads_pos2 gff_ads_pos3

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Recent Tags


Copyright© Global Food Forums®, Inc 2018 / all rights reserved